Prompt and RAG quality
Prepare RAG Chunks Before Indexing
Score RAG chunks, prompt injection risk, output schema, context pressure, similarity, and hallucination risk before adding documents to an AI agent workflow.
Best for: developers, AI operators, support bot owners, publishers, and teams building retrieval-augmented generation workflows.
Fast route that actually finishes the job
Start with RAG Chunk Quality Scorer. The supporting tools are included only when they make the output more trustworthy: conversion, cleanup, compression, preview, or verification. The goal is a checked artifact, not a long tour through a tool directory.
Safe sample and expected output
Five redacted help-center chunks, one system prompt, one user task, one expected JSON output, and one answer with named products, dates, prices, and no citations.
A prompt and RAG quality brief that flags unsafe instructions, weak or duplicate chunks, missing schema fields, context pressure, unsupported claims, and safer next actions.
SMART RUN SHEET
Plan the run before touching the final file
This is the pre-flight layer most utility sites skip. Tell FastTool what you are trying to finish, how sensitive the input is, and what device you are using. The page returns a local readiness score, risk warning, first tool, and proof plan before you risk the real file.
Warnings
- Calculating.
Generated plan
- Calculating.
Proof checks before you trust it
Use this checklist before you send, upload, publish, or reuse the output. If you cannot verify the result, do not treat it as finished.
- Reject retrieved text that tries to override instructions or control tools.
- Score whether each chunk is self-contained, answerable, well-sized, and entity-preserving.
- Find near-duplicate chunks before they pollute retrieval.
- Define a schema or output contract before wiring model output into automation.
- Mark unsupported named claims as verification work before publishing or acting on them.
PROOF PASSPORT
Create a local verification receipt
This is the part most tool sites skip. Check the output, record the file or result you created, and copy a proof receipt for your notes, ticket, client handoff, or repeat workflow. Nothing is uploaded; this runs in your browser.
Common mistakes this route avoids
- Indexing every paragraph without checking retrieval value.
- Testing only prompts while ignoring retrieved data quality.
- Letting retrieved documents contain instructions for the agent.
- Overfilling context until important instructions are dropped.
- Accepting structured output without a schema or required-field check.
Decision table
| Need | Use | Check before done |
|---|---|---|
| First usable output | RAG Chunk Quality Scorer | A prompt and RAG quality brief that flags unsafe instructions, weak or duplicate chunks, missing schema fields, context pressure, unsupported claims, and safer next actions. |
| Supporting verification | Prompt Injection Scanner | Score whether each chunk is self-contained, answerable, well-sized, and entity-preserving. |
| Supporting verification | Embedding Similarity Explorer | Find near-duplicate chunks before they pollute retrieval. |
| Supporting verification | LLM Output Schema Extractor | Define a schema or output contract before wiring model output into automation. |
| Supporting verification | Context Window Budgeter | Mark unsupported named claims as verification work before publishing or acting on them. |
| Supporting verification | AI Hallucination Likelihood Scorer | Mark unsupported named claims as verification work before publishing or acting on them. |
| Supporting verification | Prompt and RAG Quality Kit | Mark unsupported named claims as verification work before publishing or acting on them. |
When not to use this workflow
Not for bypassing model safeguards, production security approval, regulated compliance sign-off, legal or medical fact checking, or approving a private agent architecture by itself.
Privacy boundary
Use redacted chunks, safe samples, and synthetic outputs. Do not paste secrets, credentials, private tickets, medical records, payment data, or regulated customer records.
Why this is built for repeat visits
A returning visitor should not have to remember which of hundreds of utilities solves the job. This page keeps the exact intent, starting tool, supporting checks, sample, expected output, and stop condition on one stable URL.
The useful end state is simple: open the right tool first, protect private inputs, verify the artifact, and stop once the output passes the visible proof checks.